Here’s your text with line breaks for better readability:

It has been revealed that Prince Andrew requested that the BBC include additional details in his car crash interview about his friendship with Jeffrey Epstein.

King Charles III’s sibling sat down with Emily Maass in an attempt to demonstrate his innocence, but the resulting account was unfortunate, leading him to withdraw from public life.

Now, the one-hour interview is being featured in a new Amazon Prime show, “An Extremely Illustrious Embarrassment,” starring Michael Sheen as Andrew and Ruth Wilson as Maass.

He requested specific additional elements to be included, which left us quite perplexed as journalists. If someone asks you to add something, does that mean you’re altering the truth?

Prince Andrew’s interview was widely ridiculed online, particularly for his response to Virginia Giuffre’s claims of being taken by Epstein to the Tramp Club in London.

King Charles’s response to Prince Andrew’s interview revealed that he had danced with Andrew while he was sweating profusely. However, the King stated that he couldn’t be correct, as on that specific day, which we now understand to be April 10th, he was at home with the kids and had taken Beatrice to a Pizza Express in Woking for a party around 4:00 or 5:00 PM.

Another widely discussed moment occurred when Maass mentioned Giuffre’s clear recollection of that evening, describing dancing with Andrew while he was sweating. Andrew claimed it was due to a peculiar medical condition where he either does not sweat or did not sweat at all.

He explained, “There is a slight issue with sweating. I didn’t perspire at the time because I had experienced what I would describe as an excess of adrenaline during the Falklands War when I was shot at. It was nearly impossible for me to sweat.”

He further added, “It’s only recently that I’ve begun to be able to do that again.”

Maass told Good Morning England that the topic of the team discussion was how they felt about including these additional pieces.

From one perspective, yes, he asked them to include the sweating detail, and he also wanted to elaborate on the Pizza Express alibi. So they felt they couldn’t ignore his wishes, but it left them feeling a bit vulnerable as journalists.

They felt compelled to come back and add more context.

The police officer asked, “Do you have a question for our knowledgeable royal correspondents about King Charles III and Queen Camilla, Prince William and Princess Kate, Meghan and Harry, or their family?”